OpenStreetMap: Your map of last resort
Google Maps' map of Baghdad is sparse (to say the least),
Microsoft Virtual Earth isn't much better,
And Yahoo's is beginning to look familiar:
And yet Google Mapmaker isn't enabled for Iraq. What to do? OpenStreetMap to the rescue!
OpenStreetMap, going where big corporate mapping datasets fear to tread.
(And when you're done with Baghdad, check out Kabul, yet another place where Google Mapmaker isn't enabled: Yahoo Maps, Virtual Earth, Google Maps vs. OpenStreetMap. It isn't even close.) (Idea stolen from Aid Worker Daily, but for a good cause:-)
Permalink |
Del.icio.us
|
Connotea
Comments
The new Wikimapia Beta is also better than the corporate maps. Not quite as good as OpenStreetMap at the moment but I suspect it may rival it soon.
Here's the same location in Wikmapia Beta:
http://www.wikimapia.org/beta/#lat=33.2781622&lon=44.3878555&z=14&l=0&m=w&v=1&search=31.2272%2C30.0571
Posted by: Keir Clarke at 11:26 UTC, November 04, 2008
Does Wikimapa Beta makes its own maps or is it Googles?
Posted by: Nick at 12:31 UTC, November 04, 2008
I have one example for maps...
Live, Google, Yahoo, OpenStreetMap.
So, it depends on what you search for, and on who you ask for it !
Posted by: Atkati at 13:25 UTC, November 04, 2008
From what I've seen in your screenshots and in my country, Google and Microsoft use the same road data in some countries. And basing on these screenshots, all three seem to use the same water/river/shoreline data as well. :-)
Posted by: Eugene at 15:45 UTC, November 04, 2008
Here are 10 more such examples.
Posted by: Bodenseepeter at 17:10 UTC, November 04, 2008
The contributors own the openstreetmap database, unlike wanna be wikis and wanna have free MapMakers.
I'm very sorry to here that Wikimapia get contributors, even though it's 8M features are a long way from the 300M of openstreetmap it's still sad that people allow their creations to be owned by other people.
Posted by: Erik at 15:31 UTC, November 05, 2008
I have a lot of interest in this area, working for one of the big MapMaker companies... I've always advocated community input as a way of improving the map and broadening coverage. But here's the question: does the possible drop in quality from what is normally provided by commercial MapMakers bother you? For what uses would you use OpenStreetMap versus a commercially-generated map?
Posted by: Jeffrey Herr at 17:18 UTC, November 05, 2008
Openstreetmap is good if you want to create maps cheap. It doesn't take long to map a place with two OSM organizers and a bunch of inexperienced people.
If you have a large budget then you can buy very good commercial databases that are updated with the data you need. If you don't have the budget to do this then Openstreetmap can be an option, or if there's no one offering the exact data you want then it might very well be cheaper to go out and collect it yourself.
Posted by: Erik at 12:46 UTC, November 09, 2008
Posted by: emu boots at 3:30 UTC, January 26, 2010
UGG Women's Adirondack Boot II features a removable/replaceable sheepskin insole and an exclusive Vibram outsole designed specifically for UGG Australia gives stability in wet conditions.emu boots
Posted by: emu boots at 3:31 UTC, January 26, 2010
Post a comment
Ogle Earth: Recent posts
Ogle Earth's links
Archives
Movable Type 3.2



