Arunachal Pradesh: Indian or Chinese in Google Earth?
This blog has tracked a good number of stories coming from the more shrill corners of the media in certain countries, purporting to prove how Google's choice of borders for Earth and Maps is meant to show an intentional slight when the choice goes against their wishes. Such stories have mainly served to show how Google Earth has entered the public consciousness as a reference for such information. It has become important to set the Google record straight.
That doesn't mean such stories can never have a justified complaint. As this piece by the Telegraph in Calcutta points out, Google Earth shows the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh as being administered by China but claimed by India. The situation on the ground, however, is pretty much the reverse: Most of it is controlled by India, though the Chinese lay a claim to it.
Here's the view in Google Earth:
Here is the view in Google Maps:
Strictly speaking, from a neutral perspective, the Maps view is correct. For Google Earth, this would translate to both borders being colored red, perhaps with an orange border depicting the line of control.
But is this coloring intentional? I doubt it. Search for "Arunachal Pradesh" in Google Earth and you will scroll to a location tagged "Arunachal Pradesh India" by Google's own database. That's hardly siding with the Chinese.
The article brings us another interesting tidbit, one which I've not seen mentioned before: The answer to the question, "How does Google decide the status of borders in disputed regions?"
“Google Earth demarcates its maps according to international standards, following the guidance of the US Federal Information Processing Standards Publication and the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 3166 standards.”
I couldn't find any actual reference maps based on FIPS, so I can't tell if in the case of Arunachal Pradesh Google made a mistake. One possibility is that the US officially agrees with China on its claim to Arunachal Pradesh, much in the same way that the US officially agrees with China that Taiwan is part of the People's Republic.
Permalink |
Del.icio.us
|
Connotea
Comments
Aargh! The US DOES NOT agree that Taiwan is part of the PRC. Its official position is that the status of Taiwan is undecided, and has been since the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty. That was the open and public position of the US until the Nixon Administration sold out Taiwan. Then it went underground. But as the recent flap over the UN entry shows, it is still the technical official position of the United States.
It is likely that Google is getting its data from the ISO, which Taiwan recently sued to get the it to change its position that Taiwan is a province of China, thus changing the definition of Taiwan in thousands of software programs all over the world.
Michael
Posted by: Michael Turton at 15:02 UTC, November 05, 2007
Thanks for the clarification.
Posted by: Stefan at 23:03 UTC, November 05, 2007
Actually Tibet has nothing to do with Arunachal Pradesh.
The Simla agreement is invalid since that area which is now Arunachal Pradesh was part of the Kingdom of Bhutan. See this map here:
http://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/gaz_atlas_1931/fullscreen.html?object=39
So there is no question of the Tibetans giving the land to India or China refusing to give it. It was never theirs to begin with.
In any case Genghis Khan invaded and occupied China and his descendent's founded what is now "China". So if anything that entire area which is now so called "China" belongs to Mongolia.
The so called "Chinese" should stick to making fried rice and noodles and not try to pretend to be anyone other than Genghis Khan's illegitimate children.
Posted by: A Hindu at 6:03 UTC, April 24, 2008
Post a comment
Blogs linking in
NeoGeo Jobs
Ogle Earth: Recent posts
Ogle Earth's links
Archives
Movable Type 3.2